Termination Of Mediation Termination Tempest - 2119 Words

Introduction to mediation - Termination Tempest Termination Tempest is a truthful demonstration of the mediation of an employment dispute. Mediator, Margaret Shaw, in the middle of the table, works with the two parties - Kane Restaurant Supply (â€Å"KRS†), defendant, represented by Mr. Kane, son of the founder of the supply chain, and Mr. Thibideau, plaintiff, a former employee of Kane Restaurant Supply. Parties’ counsels are present as well. Plaintiff, Pat Thibideau worked at KRS for fifteen years before being fired at age sixty-six. Dahlia Rudavsky, Thibideau’s counsel, insisted that KRS violated the Federal Age Discrimination Act and claimed that KRS has an illegal retirement policy. Defendant proposed that the parties and their counsel should try to settle the case through mediation. To help the parties settle their dispute, Margaret Shaw, in joint session and private caucuses, performs two-team mediation between a terminated employee and the former employer. One of the main mediation approaches is based on the idea that mediation sessions are generally broken down into five distinct stages, sometimes called the STAR mediation model. In each stage, the mediator is trying to accomplish a task through his actions. At the end of each stage, the mediator expects to achieve the outcome or result. The final goal of mediation is to achieve a settlement of the dispute. I. Convening Stage The convening stage of mediation comprises of setting the basis to facilitate both

What You Are Being Bullied - 1176 Words

What To Do If You are Being Bullied I can’t be late! You’re running to class. I can’t be late! You think to yourself. You are so busing think of shortcuts to the school to get to class faster that you don’t see the gigantic black wall in your way. Thump! You hit the black wall so hard you go flying backwards. Then you realize it’s not a wall it’s a kid. A big kid. The school bully. â€Å"I’m so sorr-† you try to apologize but he cuts you off. â€Å"Hey nerd, WHY DID YOU RUN INTO ME YOU IDIOT? HUH? WHY? YOU OWN ME NOOGIES, SWIRLIES, AND LUNCH MONEY FOR THE REST OF THE YEAR! THAT WILL TEACH YOU TO NOT TO MESS WITH ME AGAIN!† He yells. Then he storms off. Bullying can happen anywhere anytime on anything. Now with more technology means it’s easier for†¦show more content†¦Concentrate on something else. Try thinking about what you’ll do next weekend, counting to 100, or planning your homework. Have a saying or a statement that you can repe at in your head when the bully approaches you to block out a sense of fear.† Here are some more ways to ignore the bully from wikihow.com â€Å"Act like you don t hear them speaking. Most bullying is emotional or verbal. If this happens, don t try to come up with a snappy retort. Ignore the scathing remarks that you want to say.Think of something else to ignore what they say. They will do anything to get a response out of you, but you have to act like you don t hear them. Try running through your favorite song, remembering your family s birthdays, or saying the alphabet backwards.† and â€Å"Keep any contact with them to a minimum. It s a nightmare if you have to spend time with them (for example if you are paired up in class, or if your moms are friends). In this case, make an excuse to get out of it, or talk to a superior. Tell your mom that you don t want to see him/her, or ask the teacher if you can change partners. Make sure that you explain why! You can even tal k to a guidance counselor about getting your schedule changed so your share little to no classes with them.† Even though you are being bullied it doesn’t mean you have to go through it alone, lean on your family, friends, and your loved ones for help, it will

Business Ethics and Government Contracts National Essay Example For Students

Business Ethics and Government Contracts: National Essay Semiconductor Business Ethics and Government Contracts: National Essay Semiconductor Ethics in Business from a business perspective, working under government contracts can be a very lucrative proposition. A stream of orders keep coming in, revenue increases and the company grows. The obvious downfalls to working in this manner is both higher quality expected as well as the extensive research and documentation required for government contracts. If a part fails to perform correctly it can cause minor glitches as well as problems that can carry serious repercussions, such as in the National Semiconductor case. In this paper the reader with become knowledgeable about the practices of National Semiconductor and the importance of ethical practices in business. When both the culpable component and company are found, the question arises of how extensive these repercussions should be. Is the company as an entity liable. Should we look into individual employees within that company? From an ethical perspective one would have to look at the mitigating factors of both the employees and their superiors along with the role of others in the failure of these components. Next you would have to analyze the final ruling from a corporate perspective and then we must examine the macro issue of corporate responsibility in order to attempt to find a resolution for cases like these. The first mitigating factor involved in the National Semiconductor case is the uncertainty, on the part of the employees, on the duties that they were assigned. It is plausible that during the testing procedure, an employee couldnt distinguish which parts they were to test under government standards and commercial standards. In some cases they might have even been misinformed on the final consumers of the products that they tested. In fact, ignorance on the part of the employees would fully excuse them from any moral responsibility for any damage that may result from their work. Whether it is decided that an employees is fully excused, or is given some moral responsibility, would have to be looked at on an individual basis. The second mitigating factor is the duress or threats that an employee might suffer if they do not follow through with their assignment. After the bogus testing was completed in the National Semiconductor labs, the documentation department also had to falsify documents stating that the parts had surpassed the governmental testing standards. From a legal and ethical standpoint, both the testers and the writers of the reports were merely acting as agents on direct orders from a superior. This was also the case when the plant in Singapore refused to falsify the documents and were later falsified by the employees at the have California plant before being submitted to the approval committees (Velazquez, 53). The writers of the reports were well aware of the situation yet they acted in this manner on the instruction of a supervisor. Acting in an ethical manner becomes a secondary priority in this type of environment. As stated by Alan Reder, if they the employees feel they will suffer retribution, if they report a problem, they arent too likely to open their mouths. (113). The workers knew that if the reports were not falsified they would come under questioning and perhaps their employment would go into jeopardy. Although working under these conditions does not fully excuse an employees from moral fault, it does start the divulging process for determining the order of the chain of command of superiors and it helps to narrow down the person or department that issued the original request for the unethical acts. The third mitigating factor is one that perhaps encompasses the majority of the employees in the National Semiconductor case. We have to balance the direct involvement that each employee had with the defective parts. Thus, it has to be made clear that many of the employees did not have a direct duty with the testing departments or with the parts that eventually failed. Even employees, or subcontractors, that were directly involved with the production were not aware of the incompetence on the part of the testing department. For example, the electrical engineer that designed the defective computer chip could act in good faith that it would be tested to .